The Digital C/age: Supremacy of A.I. by KuroKingdom Books
The Election, Gaslighting and Blatant Fraud as I see it. Witness America today in 2025
"These acts of vandalism are not random," said LaToya Tate, a voting rights advocate with the Southern Coalition for Social Justice. "They are strategic efforts to silence communities that have historically been the backbone of democratic change in this country. When ballot boxes are burned or vandalized in melanated neighborhoods, it creates both logistical and psychological barriers to voting."
Adding to the controversy, the newly elected president openly credited artificial intelligence (AI) for his campaign’s success in key battleground states like Pennsylvania. During a post-election press conference, he remarked, “Cutting-edge AI technology allowed us to understand voter behavior like never before. It helped us identify and mobilize the voters who could make the difference.” While his campaign team celebrated this as a triumph of innovation, critics from both sides of the aisle expressed concern over the ethical implications of deploying AI in this manner.
Many question whether the use of AI to micro-target voters is consistent with the principles of free and fair elections. Reports have surfaced that AI algorithms were employed to analyze voter data, including browsing histories, purchasing behavior, and even personal conversations on social media platforms, to craft hyper-personalized campaign ads. According to ProPublica, these ads were often tailored to exploit fears and anxieties, with messages designed to manipulate voter emotions rather than inform their choices.
"This raises serious questions about consent and manipulation," said Dr. Rashad Graham, a political ethics scholar at Howard University. "When AI tools are used to predict and influence voter behavior on such a granular level, it shifts the balance of power in campaigns. It’s no longer about persuading voters with policies; it’s about controlling how they think and feel."
………The implications for democracy are profound. Critics argue that AI-driven campaigning disproportionately disadvantages marginalized communities, who are often less aware of how their data is being weaponized. Without transparency or regulation, such practices risk undermining public trust in electoral systems and further marginalizing already vulnerable groups. From eBook: The Digital C/age : Supremacy of A.I by KuroKingdom Books Social media compounds this issue by acting as both a battleground and a breeding ground for white supremacist rhetoric. Algorithms prioritize polarizing content, driving engagement through outrage rather than education. Viral content, like the tech mogul's salute, becomes a spectacle that diverts attention from meaningful discussions about its real true implications.
This cycle of sensationalism and desensitisation directly benefits platforms financially while deepening societal divides. From eBook: The Digital C/age : Supremacy of A.I by KuroKingdom Books. The insidious nature of this process lies in its ability to normalize white supremacy through repetition and desensitization. As gestures like the mogul's salute are met with passive language and ambiguous framing, they lose their shock value over time, becoming part of the cultural fabric. This gradual erosion of outrage is a deliberate strategy, allo...
